tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post6938965001923575102..comments2023-12-27T00:49:31.972-08:00Comments on Aether Wave Theory: Higgs boson as an unparticleZephirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-30531788641722865452014-03-25T05:38:29.856-07:002014-03-25T05:38:29.856-07:00Randall Mills predicted mass of Higgs boson to 128...Randall Mills <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/TheoryPresentationPt3.pdf">predicted</a> mass of Higgs boson to 128.75 GeVZephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-37437021331203318502014-03-23T16:25:40.723-07:002014-03-23T16:25:40.723-07:00There must be particles out there smaller than Hig...<a href="http://phys.org/news/2014-03-particles-smaller-higgs-particle.html" rel="nofollow">There must be particles out there smaller than Higgs particle</a>: For me it's surprising, that the Technicolor model, i.e. <a href="http://resonaances.blogspot.cz/2012/04/bang-bang-whos-dead.html" title="http://resonaances.blogspot.cz/2012/04/bang-bang-whos-dead.html" rel="nofollow">officially falsified theory</a> still rises some proposals without word of explanation of its previous failure. In theory, electroweak symmetry can be broken without a presence of a narrow spin-0 resonance in the spectrum. Concrete realizations of that idea have long had a hard time to survive the constraints from flavor physics and electroweak precision tests, nevertheless until the last year this was a viable alternative to the Higgs boson. Alas, the observation of the Higgs boson signal at the LHC and Tevatron dealt the last blow to this branch of particle theory. <br><br>And the claim and the article really don't correlate very much, <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0848" rel="nofollow">the article</a> is about the scheme dependence of renormalization, which he finds to be mild. I have no idea why that would point to "smaller" particles, whatever "smaller" means (technicolor?), so that article just looks very bad. <br />After all, what does it mean "smaller" in physics? I actually thought it meant "smaller" as in "having a shorter de Broglie wavelength" (i.e. more massive). That said "the Higgs is composite" didn't occur to me as a possible interpretation either.<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-82843653111864711382012-03-26T14:56:52.644-07:002012-03-26T14:56:52.644-07:00Inside the 50-year battle over what to call the Hi...<a href="http://io9.com/5895316/inside-the-50+year-battle-over-what-to-call-the-higgs-boson" rel="nofollow">Inside the 50-year battle over what to call the Higgs boson</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-41832646566025547752011-11-27T05:18:05.281-08:002011-11-27T05:18:05.281-08:00In dense aether theory the only force is the press...In dense aether theory the only force is the pressure of radiation and the shielding of radiation (supergravity). Many particles are of composite nature, which brings the richness of force interactions into the macroscopic world.<br /><br />http://aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/gravity/lesage1.gif<br /><br />But the elementary particles are too small and fuzzy for to have some internal structure. In this case the shielding force becomes proportional to the size of particle itself, not to size of some even smaller particle inside. Which means, the rest mass of force carrying bosons will depend on the size of shielding particle itself. These bosons can still exist, but they're too different each other.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-26593651360317871802010-08-03T18:00:21.139-07:002010-08-03T18:00:21.139-07:00I'm afraid Prof. Hawking is right in the predi...I'm afraid Prof. Hawking is right in the prediction of the radiation emitted by the black holes but he's wrong in his prediction of the boson the Higgs as an unparticle. Because of his last folly, he's been deposed of his Chair at the University of Cambridge. It's clear that one can't fight against the Higgs mechanism without exasperate to other academic authorities, even this one was Hawking.Ciudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-91992598569866275202010-08-03T17:42:34.242-07:002010-08-03T17:42:34.242-07:00The Higgs boson has a mass of 115 GeV/c^2. What ki...The Higgs boson has a mass of 115 GeV/c^2. What kind of world are you living? Zephir, Zephir, ...Ciudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-23291249623175522842010-04-07T16:49:10.237-07:002010-04-07T16:49:10.237-07:00During time, Higgs boson mass was guessed from 109...During time, Higgs boson mass was guessed from 109+-12 GeV to 760+-21 GeV, plus two unconventional theories with 1900 GeV and 10^{18} GeV. There are so many comparably likely models - most of which contain continuous parameters whose values aren't calculable right now - that the whole interval is covered almost uniformly. <br /><br />http://arxiv.org/pdf/0708.3344Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-62609232819553975202010-02-26T12:51:27.724-08:002010-02-26T12:51:27.724-08:00/*..predictions formulated by Hawking, like the bl.../*..predictions formulated by Hawking, like the black hole radiation..*/<br />The somewhat ironic point is, if prof. Hawking will be right with his Higgs boson prediction, the he will be wrong with its model of Hawking radiation, because UnHiggs concept introduces extra-dimensions, which would effectively increase the value of Planck constant in many orders of magnitude.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-86218952218635404122010-02-26T12:47:40.492-08:002010-02-26T12:47:40.492-08:00The Standard Model does not describe the mass of H...The Standard Model does not describe the mass of Higgs boson at all – that's how come there's so much effort been expended to try to resolve this omission. Higgs bosons appear in the minimal supersymmetric extension to the standard model (<a href="http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/685557/files/conf-2003-009.pdf" rel="nofollow">MSSM</a>). This <a href="http://theoryofeverything.org/TOE/JGM/ToE.pdf" rel="nofollow">E8 based theory</a> predicts Higgs mass to be 147.98904797 GeV/c2 (mass of top quark is 173.1±1.3 GeV/c2) <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2009/mar/02/god-particle-peter-higgs-portrait-lhc" rel="nofollow">Peter Higgs portrait</a>.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-59773753635377715192010-02-17T15:05:00.673-08:002010-02-17T15:05:00.673-08:00The Higgs has nothing to do with an unparticle. Th...The Higgs has nothing to do with an unparticle. The Higgs is a true particle. The Higgs is a boson WTF? Only the envious like Hawking and the clods like you can say such nonsenses. Hawking is a very very smart guy and a better by far physicist than Higgs. But the predictions formulated by Hawking, like the black hole radiation, haven't been verified experimentally, so he can't resist, that someone like Higgs, will recieve the Noble Prize before than him, when the Higgs particle was discovered by the LHC in the next few years.Ciudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-71254567602169754672010-02-09T07:44:40.782-08:002010-02-09T07:44:40.782-08:00The ideas Hawking is principally credited with are...The ideas Hawking is principally credited with aren't originally his, or experimentally verified. Black hole thermodynamics was started by Jacob Bekenstein who developed the theory two years before Hawking got on board. Hawking got his idea of "Hawking radiation" after visiting Soviet scientists Zeldovich (of Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect fame) and Starobinsky who showed Hawking how rotating black holes must radiate. Hawking generalized the concept slightly to prove even Schwarzschild black holes must radiate. The contributions by Bekenstein or Zeldovich to science are arguably more significant than Hawking's (and at the very least are just as significant) but you will never hear from them making silly predictions about the future in the popular science news. You will never hear reddit start threads that for one of these scientists' birthday (<a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/an05p/happy_birthday_stephen_hawking/" rel="nofollow">unlike Hawking</a>). You will never see any other scientist go on TV shows claiming that history will remember them as the intellectual equals of Newton and Einstein..<br /><br />Hawking is simply famous as he has ALS and wrote an unreadable pop science book with a catchy title. He probably deserves to be recognized in any group of top 1000 or so scientists currently alive, but people treat him like he's far and away one of the best living physicists out there.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-86251327830234095112010-02-07T19:47:53.175-08:002010-02-07T19:47:53.175-08:00Bee: "The black hole horizon has no "ten...Bee: "<i>The black hole horizon has no "tension."</i>"<br /><br />Zephir: <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9601111" rel="nofollow">Surface tension, hydrophobicity, and black holes: The entropic connection</a><br /><br />After all, even the fact, all my posts were deleted illustrates clearly, who is sure by his stance here.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-18851008313824517702010-02-07T14:21:24.198-08:002010-02-07T14:21:24.198-08:00Great example for the Dunning-Kruger effect!
Thi...Great example for the Dunning-Kruger effect! <br /><br />This zephir in the discussion you are linking to <br />obviously does not know what what she is talking about, but shows complete self-confidence.porphyrnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-44732192269664842182010-02-07T06:45:08.262-08:002010-02-07T06:45:08.262-08:00How incompetent scientists are affecting the publi...How incompetent scientists <a href="http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/society/Blogger%20Backreaction%20-%20Black%20Holes%20and%20Information%20Loss.htm" rel="nofollow">are affecting</a> the public opinion about LHC experiments.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-32393515563954809232010-02-05T14:44:12.577-08:002010-02-05T14:44:12.577-08:00The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in w...The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect" rel="nofollow">Dunning–Kruger effect</a> is a cognitive bias in which "<i>people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it</i>".<br /><br />The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average, much higher than in actuality; by contrast the highly skilled underrate their abilities, suffering from illusory inferiority. This leads to a perverse result where less competent people will rate their own ability higher than more competent people. It also explains why actual competence may weaken self-confidence because competent individuals falsely assume that others have an equivalent understanding. "<i>Thus, the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others.</i>"<br /><br />Bertrand Russell: "<i>The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.</i>"Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.com