tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post5458542543857020378..comments2023-12-27T00:49:31.972-08:00Comments on Aether Wave Theory: AWT and GRB090510 photon controversyZephirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comBlogger50125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-44708643953519170582014-12-16T06:15:03.182-08:002014-12-16T06:15:03.182-08:00Confirmation bias in studies of gamma ray bursts<a href="http://phys.org/news/2014-12-bias-gamma-ray.html" rel="nofollow">Confirmation bias in studies of gamma ray bursts</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-39568038546230798882014-04-30T17:12:43.110-07:002014-04-30T17:12:43.110-07:00The circular polarization in the optical afterglow...<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13237" rel="nofollow">The circular polarization in the optical afterglow of GRB 121024A</a> could explain, why we didn't observe any delay between light of different frequencies in distant GRBs. My explanation of this controversy is, the photons move with different speed during this - but they do revolve mutually, which manifest itself just with circular polarization of their light.<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-79786517607413716402013-09-20T11:39:04.194-07:002013-09-20T11:39:04.194-07:00Here's the article that rules out almost all d...Here's the article that rules out almost all discrete (i.e. Lorentz violating) theories:<br /><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7271/full/nature08574.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7271/full/nature08574.html</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-32284289112257961092011-10-17T16:32:50.379-07:002011-10-17T16:32:50.379-07:00New constraints on energy-dependent speed of light...<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.5191" rel="nofollow">New constraints on energy-dependent speed of light from gamma ray bursts</a> <br />As I explained here before some time, the comparison of speed of visible light and gamma ray photons could be misleading, because these two thingies tend to revolve mutually during their travel at cosmic distances, so you'll always find a smaller difference in speed, then it really exists inside of such system.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-75903729621763404452011-09-21T02:14:34.586-07:002011-09-21T02:14:34.586-07:00Can Neutrinos be Superluminal? Ask OPERA! From per...<a href="http://blog.vixra.org/2011/09/19/can-neutrinos-be-superluminal/" rel="nofollow">Can Neutrinos be Superluminal? Ask OPERA!</a> From perspective of AWT the antineutrinos are behaving like subtle bubbles and they're of slightly negative mass with respect to normal neutrinos. The ratio can be estimated like the ratio of energy of CMBR photons and the rest mass of neutrino. But the main origin of the difference observed is in the rest mass of gamma ray photons and neutrinos. Gamma ray photons are heavy and they're spreading with (macroscopically) subluminal speed because they're moving in spirals through CMBR.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-77428713588399022442011-01-24T13:22:34.235-08:002011-01-24T13:22:34.235-08:00If neutrinos are packed together tightly enough, t...<a href="http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/cms/?pid=1000848" rel="nofollow">If neutrinos are packed together tightly enough, they become social, interactive party animals.</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-18977776955098770622010-02-13T15:55:51.001-08:002010-02-13T15:55:51.001-08:00Turbulent airflow leads to random fluctuations in ...Turbulent airflow leads to random fluctuations in atmospheric temperature, and those make the atmosphere more or less easy for photons to traverse. The fluctuations will <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.2492" rel="nofollow">sometimes produce</a> a more transparent environement, through which more entangled photons can travel without being scattered. Analogously, the spreading of microwaves through metamaterial environment made of semiconductor foam <a href="http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2010/01/universe-and-rainbow-of-black-holes.html" rel="nofollow">may lead into its focusation</a>, in fact. Even the formation of dark Alexander's band in the rainbow could correspond the absence of dispersion of photons in certain range of wavelength.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-85213763907388101562009-12-16T07:44:31.518-08:002009-12-16T07:44:31.518-08:00The appearance of photonballs in vacuum should cor...The appearance of photonballs in vacuum should correspond the appearance of single photons which should correspond the appearance of quantum vortices on boson condensates.<br /><br />The both parameters are compressed, Because wave packet cannot contain only fraction of wave (it would violate the eigenvalue postulate of quantum mechanics) both wavelength, both size of wave packet is compressed and <a href="http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/quantum/condensate_soliton.gif" rel="nofollow">the shape of vortices in boson condensates</a> is pretty close to appearance of real photons in vacuum - it's just greatly reduced in scale along path of direction.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-62138602394493275212009-11-17T14:46:53.036-08:002009-11-17T14:46:53.036-08:00For further reading: Phenomenological Quantum Grav...For further reading: <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0911/0911.2761v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">Phenomenological Quantum Gravity</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-56817286951909965522009-11-08T07:18:51.001-08:002009-11-08T07:18:51.001-08:00BTW Condensation of gamma ray photons in field of ...BTW Condensation of gamma ray photons in field of microwave photons is semi-classical example of tachyonic condensation of open strings into D-strings, as proposed first by Sen in 1999 at scope of open string field theory, introduced by Witten in 1986. In another way, one string theorist is fighting against demonstration of low energy density analogy of model, proposed by another string theorists. This example demonstrates clearly, how deeply are some string theorists separated from reality, which they're trying to describe.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-71938613523560970162009-09-18T17:34:57.997-07:002009-09-18T17:34:57.997-07:00/*..This blog is an uncensored website or I'm .../*..This blog is an uncensored website or I'm wrong....*/<br />Are you kidding? Of course it's censored like most of others. For example, if you place here some link to child pornography, it will be deleted.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-40040662721033118482009-09-18T17:25:04.361-07:002009-09-18T17:25:04.361-07:00I'm just saying, saying the things, which aren...I'm just saying, saying the things, which aren't supported at least by some logic is nonscientific.<br /><br />This doesn't mean, logical things are science by definition - but the absence of logic is not what I'm willing to support in discussions.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-23579569463707042092009-09-18T16:58:09.619-07:002009-09-18T16:58:09.619-07:00But, who is speaking about science, here? The scie...But, who is speaking about science, here? The science is forbidden , only it's allowed to speak about pseudoscience here (by the ignorance, not by the rules). Anyway, I don't care if my comments have liked to you or not. If they don't like you then don't read them, it's very easy. I'm going to write what I want, not what you want. I can insult you and you can insult me. This blog is an uncensored website or I'm wrong.Ciudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-50620224805253642662009-09-18T14:32:00.173-07:002009-09-18T14:32:00.173-07:00/*..you haven't convinced me...*/
More then 70.../*..you haven't convinced me...*/<br />More then 70% Americans don't believe in evolution - they're simply not convinced by any evidence. In addition, convinction isn't testable, ability to object something is.<br /><br />Science cares only about testable things. So I don't care, if people are feeling convinced or not - but if they've something to object. <br /><br />Can you object something? If not, I'm finished for now.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-68837845875334480512009-09-18T08:36:22.711-07:002009-09-18T08:36:22.711-07:00Zephir,
Good argument, but in vain. You haven...Zephir,<br /><br />Good argument, but in vain. You haven't convinced me. Don't forget that the extinction is inescapable in the future. Therefore, the pseudoscience is not better than the ignorance.Ciudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-78349078230046545872009-09-18T07:24:18.499-07:002009-09-18T07:24:18.499-07:00Not in long term perspective. This is why evolutio...Not in long term perspective. This is why evolution needs mutations: some of them are uselless or even lethal - but sometimes they become a driving force of further evolution. Without mutations we would become extinct already.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-33488733373993432712009-09-17T18:49:55.230-07:002009-09-17T18:49:55.230-07:00To be an ignorant is better than to be a crank. D...To be an ignorant is better than to be a crank. Doesn't it?Ciudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-28372952506013531902009-09-15T14:55:51.398-07:002009-09-15T14:55:51.398-07:00We should label theory as cranky because we know i...We should label theory as cranky because we know it - not because we don't know about it. This is what the ignorance is called.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-6444101902304592872009-09-15T12:29:23.395-07:002009-09-15T12:29:23.395-07:00This is not scientific approach.
But, Is my fault...<i>This is not scientific approach.</i><br /><br />But, Is my fault that I'm unable of understanding a word of Heim' s theory?. What is the selector calculus? I have no idea. <br /><br /><i>Without causal implication our stance is just atemporal random noise and it cannot be verified in reproducible way.</i><br /><br />Maybe, you're right, but as I don't understand the Heim's theory at all, for me is more easy to think that the theory makes not sense and Heim was a crank. At least, I know that the theory does exist, most of people have never heard anything about this theory.Ciudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-38982066089877081462009-09-15T01:19:59.306-07:002009-09-15T01:19:59.306-07:00This is not scientific approach. We should always ...This is not scientific approach. We should always have some reasoning for our stance. In AWT only causal gradients which are defining time arrow of particular implication are atemporal an visible. Without causal implication our stance is just atemporal random noise and it cannot be verified in reproducible way.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-19634765515200808922009-09-14T15:33:57.092-07:002009-09-14T15:33:57.092-07:00nonoCiudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-29116873426207023142009-09-14T02:22:03.773-07:002009-09-14T02:22:03.773-07:00/*...Heim was the king of the crackpots ... and hi.../*...Heim was the king of the crackpots ... and his theory ... is simply inconsistent...*/<br />LOL. Any proof of it?Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-25223451150269648792009-09-13T18:45:22.797-07:002009-09-13T18:45:22.797-07:00Quantoken is a quack with a little fame, who arous...<a href="http://motls.blogspot.com/2006/01/meeting-quantoken.html" title="" rel="nofollow">Quantoken</a> is a quack with a little fame, who aroused the interest <a href="http://www.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~motl/sumavablog/prophet-medium.JPG" title="" rel="nofollow">of a prophet called Lubos Motl</a>. And Heim was the king of the crackpots (R.I.P.) and his theory (Heim theory) is simply inconsistent. A pity that the world was so hard, doesn't it?.<br /><br />I don't know who is L.Rifrio and Sly Kornowski, so I will shut up.Ciudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-22334821564705793932009-09-13T18:06:55.134-07:002009-09-13T18:06:55.134-07:00Well, I still don't see anything...
Because,...<i>Well, I still don't see anything... </i><br /><br />Because, you don't know how to distinguish between a true scientist and an idler.<br /><br />"<i>Mr.</i>" Matty is only a lagger man, who is cadging to the Finnish citizens. An opprobrium to the dignity of Finland.<br /><br />And I don't care if I am a rude one and what I'm writing is not polite. I'm going to write the true, neither more nor less. If you don't like then don't read it, thanks.Ciudadano Kanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-22671973930951636092009-09-13T13:31:56.233-07:002009-09-13T13:31:56.233-07:00Well, I still don't see anything...
At first...Well, I still don't see anything... <br /><br />At first, I don't understand, why are you documenting crackpotism of Mr. Pitkänen by subjective claims of someone else. <br /><br />At second, concerning the testable predictions, if Mr. Pitkänen would be a serious superstring theorists, his answer would be still probably the very same. Testable predictions are sensitive theme for modern physical theories in general, you know...;-) Only rather old theories (like the Aether one) can say something specific about it.<br /><br />To make things clear, I don't think, Pitkänen's approach to physics is relevant at all cases, but it certainly should be analyzed in the same way, like work of B. Heim, L.Rifrio, Quantoken or Sly Kornowski. Until we do it, naive halfeducated ignorants cannot say nothing relevant about it, simply because they don't understand, what these people are really dealing with.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.com