tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post7549192014810029282..comments2023-12-27T00:49:31.972-08:00Comments on Aether Wave Theory: Archetypes, symbols and Aether conceptZephirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-49232926265501115302020-11-20T03:09:01.133-08:002020-11-20T03:09:01.133-08:00Scientists Uncover the Universal Geometry of Geolo...<a href="https://www.quantamagazine.org/geometry-reveals-how-the-world-is-assembled-from-cubes-20201119/" rel="nofollow">Scientists Uncover the Universal Geometry of Geology</a>: <em>Plato was right: On average, the world is made out of cubes</em>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-27147277669812866362018-09-23T07:26:12.447-07:002018-09-23T07:26:12.447-07:00Heaven's gate<a href="https://i.imgur.com/fmzpZGo.jpg" rel="nofollow">Heaven's gate</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-29844942757099249862016-05-08T10:20:28.932-07:002016-05-08T10:20:28.932-07:00Duck face or a** face?<a href="http://i.imgur.com/6eNRHmi.jpg" rel="nofollow">Duck face or a** face?</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-82505973814257185112013-01-13T07:04:07.312-08:002013-01-13T07:04:07.312-08:00Has the Milky Way Lost Weight? Milky Way May Be Mo...<a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/01/has-the-milky-lost-weight.html?ref=hp" rel="nofollow">Has the Milky Way Lost Weight</a>? <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=galaxy-grande-milky-way-milky-way-may-be-more-massive-than-thought" rel="nofollow">Milky Way May Be More Massive Than Thought </a><br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-11094756798597189442012-02-28T10:58:10.754-08:002012-02-28T10:58:10.754-08:00The distribution of inner planets inside of solar ...The distribution of inner planets inside of solar system is not random, as J. Kepler <a href="http://www.uff.br/cdme/kepler/kepler-html/kepler-en.html" rel="nofollow">noted already</a>, which implies, the Solar Nebular Disk Model will be more relevant here. The density fluctuations inside of dense gas will follow the dodecahedral geometry of hypersphere particle packing, which we can seen inside of fluctuations of dark matter and this geometry could even take place during formation of planets from sufficiently dense protoplanetary disk. This model could explain the <a href="http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/aether/protoplanetary_tilt.gif" rel="nofollow">retrograde tilt</a> of Venus and Uranus planets, too. The outer planets were rather formed with accretion, i.e. from bottom up, because they emerged from more sparse areas of protoplanetary disk.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-34662761333464370402011-12-22T04:16:28.404-08:002011-12-22T04:16:28.404-08:00This dispersive model corresponds the character of...This dispersive model corresponds the character of wave spreading along water surface. At the shortest distance the surface waves are dispersing into indeterministic Brownian noise in longitudinal waves, at the larger distances the deterministic transverse waves become dominant, which correspond the formal strictly deterministic approach of formal rigour based science. But at the most distant areas this deterministic model changes into indeterministic again and the transverse ripples are dispersing back into longitudinal waves in the way, which doesn't differ from the short distance conceptually, with exception of its distance and energy density scale.<br /><br />In this context it's not so surprising, the ancient most primitive people understood the universe in similar way, like these most advanced ones today.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-14943723873053298352011-12-22T04:07:37.704-08:002011-12-22T04:07:37.704-08:00The dark energy, inflation and Big Bang singularit...The dark energy, inflation and Big Bang singularity were all introduced just to explain observations - so we indeed do have the evidence for all these things. The question is, if these explanations are correct from more general perspective. As the level of technology improves, we observe more and more distant areas of Universe, which allows us to apply extrinsic perspective to existing intrinsic observations. This is how the flat Earth model has been replaced with spherical one, geocentric solar system with heliocentric one, the Milky Way Universe with Universe of many galaxies, the Big Bang Universe with Steady State multiverse. This evolution always replaces the antropocentric model with Copernician principle and it's probable, it will continue in future too.<br /><br />In this connection it's significant, at the very beginning the people always considered the more general model first. The old Greece believed in spherical Earth, the old Arabian in heliocentric model, the even older swastika symbol for Milky Way means "the wheel of Suns" in Sancrit and it represents its rectangular shape with infinity symbol at its center.<br /><br />http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1790<br />http://thesantosrepublic.com/2011/07/infinity-symbol-found-in-milky-way-center/<br /><br />And the ancient vedian prana archetype points to infinite eternal Universe. It seems, the old people always believed in extrinsic model first (as it requires less postulates), but the formally thinking science has replaced it with intrinsic model and just after time it returned back into extrinsic one. IMO this evolution of Universe understanding is lawful and predictable and it follows from dense aether theory, it's dispersive mechanism of information spreading in particular.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-53109737698927943352011-12-04T06:30:55.232-08:002011-12-04T06:30:55.232-08:00The proponents of mainstream physics are remarkabl...The proponents of mainstream physics are remarkably consistent regarding dismissal of both aether model, both hypothesis of God. IMO it's because both models share a common origin, i.e. the assumption of underlying hidden causal reality, which is omnipresent and omnipotent, but it manifests itself only in subtle way at the common life. IMO the notion of God of many religions comes just from the instinctive feeling of this hidden underlying reality, in this sense the religion has its rational physical origin. Note that the completely chaotic phenomena can be interpreted like the manifestation of intelligent deity in hyperdimensions. For our animal pets our conscious behaviour would appear completely incomprehensible, random and unpredictable and we are at the same position regarding the quantum or Brownian noise.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-32180058100769524262010-10-14T13:26:05.810-07:002010-10-14T13:26:05.810-07:00In connection to newly revealed rectangular shape ...In connection to newly revealed <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1790" rel="nofollow">rectangular shape of Milky Way galaxy</a> the following question arises: wasn't the swastika used as a "wheel of suns", i.e. cosmic symbol in eastern countries?<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika<br /><br />The dodecahedron used as the symbol fifth element, aether or Universe brings the resemblance of structure of dark matter and heteorotic nested condensation of Aether foam <br /><br />http://tinyurl.com/372fl3m<br /><br />It would point to cosmological origin of many symbols of sacred geometry.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-87672110677707192242010-08-03T18:10:20.914-07:002010-08-03T18:10:20.914-07:00Women attracted to men in red, research shows...
...<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news199962575.html" rel="nofollow">Women attracted to men in red</a>, research shows...<br /><br />I don't believe, all preferences are of pure sexual origin. It's well known, women are liking pink and red color in general, while males prefer shades of blue. Men can distinguish more shades of blue color, because they're looking often at horizon at distance (being hunters by their nature). Women collected red fruits for food from proximity, so they're more sensible at the red-green part of spectrum.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.com