tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post6660761405785805465..comments2023-12-27T00:49:31.972-08:00Comments on Aether Wave Theory: AWT and gravitational wavesZephirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-38356858861625661092014-12-30T02:16:55.691-08:002014-12-30T02:16:55.691-08:00According to this study (compare also here and her...According to <a href="http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1139/cjp-2014-0184" rel="nofollow">this study</a> (compare <a href="http://www.arxiv.uk.com/upload/Andrew_09072014_8.pdf" rel="nofollow">also here</a> and <a href="http://www.ihes.fr/~damour/Conferences/DamourDeruelleAIHP86.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>) the decrease in the pulsar <br />PSR B 1534 + 12 orbital period is given by curvature of space-time itself, not with radiation of alleged gravitational waves.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-54830400579709933752014-10-19T05:32:22.569-07:002014-10-19T05:32:22.569-07:00Goryachev and Tobar overcame this problem by targe...<i>Goryachev and Tobar overcame this problem by targeting gravitational radiation in the 1–1000 MHz range</i><br />The discussion at PhysicsWorld bellow <a href="http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2014/oct/17/tabletop-experiment-could-detect-gravitational-waves" rel="nofollow">this article</a> has been locked from good reason. It's evident, the physicists have no idea about frequency of gravitational waves (in the same way, like they're improvising regarding search of extradimensions and/or dark matter particles) - but they still want the money for their "re-search". During time the frequency of alleged gravitational waves has been raised by ten orders (the search for holographic noise belongs into the same scenario). The 1 GHz range exists well within the CMBR range, which are actual gravitational waves <a href="http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.cz/2009/09/awt-and-gravitational-waves.html" rel="nofollow">according to AWT</a> - and also the thermal noise induced with quantum fluctuations inside of solids. <br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-82541943110747673992014-05-14T17:23:28.013-07:002014-05-14T17:23:28.013-07:00Actually in rigorous (i.e. strictly four-dimension...Actually in rigorous (i.e. strictly four-dimensional) general relativity the gravitational waves cannot move in similar way, like the gravitational lenses cannot evolve. The time dimension is already "consumed" for creation of space-time curvature - so until you have no other higher time-like dimension available, the resulting artifact cannot simply change. In accordance with it the gravitational waves cannot be radiated with spherical object and every other object is higher-dimensional. Also, as Eddington explained before many years, the gravitational waves have no speed and reference frame defined - in flat space-time the gravitational wave serves as its own reference frame. So if you would see the gravitational wave propagating, it will not serve as a confirmation of general relativity, but its violation instead. Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-20205261923705592462014-03-14T05:08:56.268-07:002014-03-14T05:08:56.268-07:00Earth as Giant Gravitational Wave Detector - seism...<a href="http://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.101102" rel="nofollow">Earth as Giant Gravitational Wave Detector</a> - seismographic data place new, stronger limits on the amount of gravitational wave energy in the Universe.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-53915080272397385462014-02-25T04:34:59.387-08:002014-02-25T04:34:59.387-08:00A. Loinger, "Vain is the pursuit of gravity w...A. Loinger, "V<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0002267" rel="nofollow">ain is the pursuit of gravity waves</a>", (1999), "<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0002267" rel="nofollow">On PSR1913+16</a>", (2000), "<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0312149" rel="nofollow">Non-existence of gravitational waves</a>. (2003), "<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3835" rel="nofollow">Einsteinian Manifolds and Gravitational Waves</a>", (2007), "<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3158" rel="nofollow">On the LIGO-VIRGO search of coalescing-binary signals</a>"(2012)<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-89021514016170052192013-11-21T10:43:34.724-08:002013-11-21T10:43:34.724-08:00The gravitons were just designed as a virtual part...The gravitons were just designed as a virtual particles, mediating the gravitational force (i.e. like the analogy of photons, mediating the EM force). <br />In AWT they're doing it by transfer of matter, which is the source of gravity. The matter is <a href="http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2006/08/11/339534-you-are-made-of-space-time" rel="nofollow">nothing else</a>, than the curvature of space-time, in similar way like the alleged gravitational waves. Therefore the gravitons are <a href="http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.cz/2009/09/awt-and-gravitational-waves.html" rel="nofollow">actually formed with gravitational waves</a>. Their role to gravitational waves is analogous to role of photons with respect to light.<br />In AWT the photons and gravitons <a href="http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/gravity/gravitons.gif" rel="nofollow">usually come together</a>, as the graviton is the 2-spin component of every light wave, the photon is the 1-spin component of every light wave. The matter which gets radiated during glow of stars and during supernovae explosions is mediated just with graviton part of photons, which is doing these photons massive.<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-12423549814273333372013-08-04T02:52:42.910-07:002013-08-04T02:52:42.910-07:00Another reason against existence of gravitational ...Another reason against existence of gravitational waves (as the mainstream physics imagines it) is the concept of gravitational waves itself You don't you believe into it? Well, if every spherically unsymmetrical change of space-time curvature should radiate the gravitational waves, then every gravitational wave should radiate these waves too, well, recursively - and they should scatter and decay fast. This is actually quite consistent with AWT model, in which the underwater waves will scatter fast into noise of solitons at the moment, when they achieve the water surface after brief distance. <br /><b><a href="http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/relativity/gravitational_waves.gif" rel="nofollow">animation</a></b> <br />Surprisingly enough, this insight is supported long time with mainstream physics too in the form of argument against gravitational geons. In 1954 J.A.Wheeler proposed a hypothetical object, composed of gravitational waves only - so called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geon_(physics" rel="nofollow">gravitational geon</a>). This concept has been studied extensively until Brill and Hartle in 1964 proved, that the geons can be never gravitationally stable. But the physicists apparently didn't realize, such a conclusion applies to the gravitational waves too. <br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-57222533180215561852013-07-13T10:06:12.511-07:002013-07-13T10:06:12.511-07:00Gravity Makes the Universe Classical<a href="http://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/78" rel="nofollow">Gravity Makes the Universe Classical</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-364801849578025852013-05-18T14:05:37.263-07:002013-05-18T14:05:37.263-07:00Here's a simple EM thought experiment that sho...Here's a simple EM thought experiment that shows that non-propagating modes are required. We all know that a point source can emit EM radiation. However, if you time reverse the situation, one is confronted by the fact that incoming propagating waves can't be focused to a point. How do we resolve this paradox? THe resolution is that the point source emits some non-propagating modes (fall off as 1/r3 , IIRC) as well.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-807670944385417882013-05-18T05:28:15.566-07:002013-05-18T05:28:15.566-07:00Eddington's original article: The present inve...<a href="http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/102/716/268.full.pdf" rel="nofollow">Eddington's original article</a>: The present investigation leads to the conclusion that transverse-transverse waves are propagated with the speed of light in all systems of co-ordinates. Waves of the first [longitudinal] and second [torsional] types have no fixed velocity. They are mere sinuosities in the co-ordinate system, and the only speed of propagation relevant to them is the "speed of thought". In fact Eddington had a very clear idea of a co-ordinate free method of determining the modes of gravitational wave propagation (via infinitesimal diffeomorphisms of the co-ordinate systems) well before Einstein, whom <a href="http://dafix.uark.edu/~danielk/Physics/Referee.pdf" rel="nofollow">only managed this</a> 15 years later.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-87304778999894954132013-05-15T10:14:34.156-07:002013-05-15T10:14:34.156-07:00Aberration and the Speed of Gravity The observed a...<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909087" rel="nofollow">Aberration and the Speed of Gravity</a> The observed absence of gravitational aberration requires that Newtonian gravity propagate at a speed cg > 2 × 10E+10 c.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-50899639104584860252013-03-29T03:45:14.218-07:002013-03-29T03:45:14.218-07:00During the total eclipses of the sun on June 30, 1...<a href="http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1999/ast06aug99_1/" rel="nofollow">During the total eclipses of the sun on June 30, 1954, and October 22, 1959, quite analogous deviations of the plane of oscillation of the paraconical pendulum were observed.</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-64690094779389788652012-11-26T14:26:36.866-08:002012-11-26T14:26:36.866-08:00In Space, Time and Gravitation Eddington discusses...In Space, Time and Gravitation Eddington discusses the <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.2913" rel="nofollow">speed of gravity propagation</a>. He remarks that if gravity propagated with nite velocity the motion of the planets around the Sun would become unstable, due to a torque acting on the planets. The problem was already known to Newton and was examined by Laplace, who calculated a lower limit for the gravity propagation velocity nding a value much larger than the speed of lightZephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-24238970099343532872012-09-03T08:55:06.430-07:002012-09-03T08:55:06.430-07:00Astronomical observations indicate that the Earth&...Astronomical observations indicate that the Earth's acceleration is toward the gravitational center of the sun even though it is moving around the sun, whereas light from the sun is observed to be aberated. If the gravitational force between the sun and the earth were aberated then gravitational forces tangent to the earth's orbit would result, causing the earth to spiral away from the sun, due to conservation of angular momentum. Current astronomical observations estimate the phase speed of gravity to be greater than 2E1010 c. The <a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9706082" rel="nofollow">Walker-Dual paper</a> did demonstrate velocities for electrical and gravitational phase propagation in excess of the speed of light. This was predicted by Feynman's 1963 calculations, and does not contradict conventional theory. Walker and Dual also tentatively reported superluminal group electrical wave propagation, and wrote that this may violate causality. In 2000 William Walker <a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9706082" rel="nofollow">wrote a paper</a> describing superluminal electrical wave propagation in the near-field realm, ie one wavelength or less from a dipole emitter. He then proposed that magnetic and gravitational fields would behave similarly. Near the end of his paper he made some of the same claims as Van Flandern: "Light from the sun is not observed to be collinear with the sun's gravitational force. Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-57788875673959607592012-08-28T17:31:24.262-07:002012-08-28T17:31:24.262-07:00Note that the change of period of Taylor-Hulce pul...Note that the change of period of Taylor-Hulce pulsar can be explained with tidal forces easily. It's the only experimental verification of gravitational waves we have - but the tidal forces were never considered in it - why? Their magnitude depends on the viscosity of stars, which cannot be estimated reliably - so it was simply neglected as a whole - and Taylor-Hulce got their Nobel prize...Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-12759660908329616612012-05-18T13:58:19.093-07:002012-05-18T13:58:19.093-07:00The difficult childhood of gravitational waves<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/04/25/the-difficult-childhood-of-gravitational-waves/" rel="nofollow">The difficult childhood of gravitational waves</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-20326827379378794622012-04-08T02:45:03.185-07:002012-04-08T02:45:03.185-07:00The failure of the Einstein gravitational field eq...The failure of the Einstein gravitational field equation to include a tensor characterizing the gravitational field <a href="http://www.olduniverse.com/1,6%20Einstein%20Eq.%20Limits.pdf" rel="nofollow">is a severe limitation</a>.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-26742488910885547642012-03-29T17:32:38.752-07:002012-03-29T17:32:38.752-07:00In 1863 F.A.E. and Em. Keller presented a theory b...In 1863 F.A.E. and Em. Keller <a href="http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3013s/f530.item" rel="nofollow">presented</a> a theory by using a Le Sage type mechanism in combination with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longitudinal_wave" rel="nofollow">longitudinal waves</a> of the aether. They supposed that those waves are propagating in every direction and losing some of their momentum after the impact on bodies, so between two bodies the pressure exerted by the waves is weaker than the pressure around them. In 1869 L. de Boisbaudran <a href="http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k30260/f705.item" rel="nofollow">presented</a> the same model as Leray, but like Keller he replaced the particles with longitudinal waves of the aether. In AWT these longitudinal waves are just gravitational waves, it's the only difference.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-33691793041158401412011-11-21T05:00:34.528-08:002011-11-21T05:00:34.528-08:00Aether drag belongs into isomorhism of Navier-Stok...Aether drag belongs into <a href="http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/aether/isomorphism.gif" rel="nofollow">isomorhism of Navier-Stokes equations and Maxwells equations</a>. For example the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame-dragging" rel="nofollow">Lense-Thirring drag</a> for gravitating bodies and <a href="http://th-www.if.uj.edu.pl/acta/vol41/pdf/v41p2297.pdf" rel="nofollow">Wayne drag</a> for charged bodies. It was observed many times, for example at the case of slowing of fast rotating pulsars. For example the famous troll case: In 1974 Russell A. Hulse and Joseph H. Taylor located the slowing of PSR 1913 16, attributed it (incorrectly) to gravitational waves radiation and they even got Nobel price for it in 1993. Although whole this story is apparently just about Lense-Thirring drag inside of binary systems.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-37779132170169595012011-05-02T01:49:55.576-07:002011-05-02T01:49:55.576-07:00A. Loinger (2000), Non-existence of radiation damp...A. Loinger (2000), Non-existence of radiation damping of gravitational waves<a href="http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0003/0003230.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0003/0003230.pdf</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-8133851186744075332011-02-23T11:50:49.804-08:002011-02-23T11:50:49.804-08:00No gravitational waves have been seen so far at LI...<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.3781" rel="nofollow">No gravitational waves have been seen so far at LIGO</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-39390485867289708732010-12-29T21:18:10.613-08:002010-12-29T21:18:10.613-08:00In Issue of Nature, March 1, 2007, Clive Speake wr...In Issue of Nature, March 1, 2007, Clive Speake wrote about another prediction of String Theory made by Sundrum[R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044014 (2004).]. In it, graviton is a "fat string", with a spatial scale associated with it at 90 microns. This means that the good old Newton's gravitational constant is expected to deviate from its standard value below 90 microns. A recent measurement of the gravitational constant made by Kapner et al.[2] have measured the gravitational constant up to 55 microns, with no deviation from the expected value [D.J. Kapner, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 021101 (2007)]Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-4006636568931337282010-12-17T18:21:35.033-08:002010-12-17T18:21:35.033-08:00Although Einstein had defended the principle of re...Although Einstein had defended the principle of relativity, Poincaré <a href="http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/03/1907-crisis-in-mathematical-physics.html" rel="nofollow">wasn't convinced</a>, and in particular worried about the prohibition on superluminal signaling. Anticipating a coming revolution in gravity, he wrote: "<i>are such signals inconceivable, if we admit with Laplace that universal gravitation is transmitted a million times more rapidly than light?</i>"Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-22417675588787161172010-11-27T13:22:55.036-08:002010-11-27T13:22:55.036-08:00Relativists use a simplified form of Eistein field...Relativists use a simplified form of Eistein field equations to calculate various properties of his gravitational field, including Einstein gravitational waves, which are based on the Einstein's pseudo-tensor. This simplified form is called the linearised field equations. They do this because Einstein's field equations are highly non-linear (implicit actually) and impossible to solve analytically. So they use the linearised form, simply assuming that they can do so. However Hermann Weyl proved in 1944 already, that linearisation of the field equations implies the existence of a Einstein's pseudo-tensor that, except for the trivial case of being precisely zero, does not otherwise exist:<br /><br />http://www.jstor.org/stable/2371768<br /><br />T. Levi-Civita's derivation of the divergence of pseudo-tensor: <br /><br />http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Levi-Civita.pdf<br /><br />In linearized, Einstein–Maxwell theory on flat spacetime, an oscillating electric dipole is the source of a spin-2 field <br /><br />http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/462/2071/1987.full<br /><br />As Eddington pointed out already before many years, gravitational waves do not have a unique speed of propagation. The speed of the alleged waves is coordinate dependent. A different set of coordinates yields a different speed of propagation and such waves would propagate like noise.<br /><br />The same result can be imagined easily with water surface model, where transverse waves are serving like analogy of waves of light and the gravitational waves are behaving like longitudinal sound waves, which are spreading through underwater. Because sound waves are spreading a way faster, then the surface waves, they would manifest like indeterministic noise at the water surface - and no expensive analysis or devices is required for such understandingZephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-23661357442573339392010-11-25T12:55:16.175-08:002010-11-25T12:55:16.175-08:00The story of Einsteins first peer review - a
pape...<a href="http://scitation.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_58/iss_9/43_1.shtml" rel="nofollow">The story of Einsteins first peer review - a <br />paper with wrong conclusions and the revelation of the reviewer's identity 70 years later</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.com