tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post5072755445211513074..comments2023-12-27T00:49:31.972-08:00Comments on Aether Wave Theory: Aether and formal mathematicsZephirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-40532338340295334612015-03-24T23:45:59.900-07:002015-03-24T23:45:59.900-07:00Do you have calculations showing this?
Do you h...<i>Do you have calculations showing this? </i> <br /><br />Do you have calculations proving you're real? Only the contemporary physicists believe, everything must be calculable - <a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2011/12/0083720" title="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2011/12/0083720 " rel="nofollow">or it cannot exist</a>. For example, they believe, that the cold fusion cannot be computed from existing models, so it's denied by the whole century. In another words, the belief in calculability, which is promoted by existing priests of science at universities has replaced the medieval religion and belief in God. The concept of mathematical universe is an economical theorem - rather than something else. In fact it only provides the social credit and job for these people in the same way, like the belief in God provided an income for medieval priests.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-59047264494686612942014-10-11T17:26:44.532-07:002014-10-11T17:26:44.532-07:00V.I. Arnold, On teaching mathematics<a href="http://pauli.uni-muenster.de/~munsteg/arnold.html?goats=yes" rel="nofollow">V.I. Arnold, On teaching mathematics</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-51559977090245036562014-06-08T22:02:14.267-07:002014-06-08T22:02:14.267-07:00You can't do the math without the words: Many ...You can't do the math without the words: <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/02/120221104037.htm" rel="nofollow">Many tribal nations don't use <br />calculus at all.</a> They're still use a language. Also, many animals can count, but they use nonverbal language only, not calculus.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-9374473379289527892014-04-18T06:27:42.357-07:002014-04-18T06:27:42.357-07:00Lee Smolin has written a whole book about the prob...Lee Smolin has written a whole book about <a href="" rel="nofollow">the problem</a> with the <a href="http://backreaction.blogspot.de/2013/04/book-review-time-reborn-by-lee-smolin.html" rel="nofollow">timeless math</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-65614568455249035012014-01-25T16:20:37.513-08:002014-01-25T16:20:37.513-08:00Hartry Field’s Science Without Numbers: A Defence ...Hartry Field’s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Science-Without-Numbers-Defence-Nominalism/dp/0691072604" rel="nofollow">Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism</a> which shows you can do Newtonian physics without math.<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-19034369567001028162014-01-14T04:22:17.958-08:002014-01-14T04:22:17.958-08:00Max Tegmark argues that we have to get rid of equa...<a href="http://www.edge.org/response-detail/25344" rel="nofollow">Max Tegmark</a> argues that we have to get rid of equations in physics that aren’t just based on finite and discrete quantities. Nature history: <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/history-shut-up-and-calculate-1.14458" rel="nofollow">"Shut up and calculate!"</a> The nuclear weapon research contributed significantly not just for the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcgncswziSc" rel="nofollow">social statut of physicists</a> but for credit of computational methods and formal approach in physics too - because the nuclear weapon design requires lotta calculations.<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-81246771668995042912013-12-23T03:08:50.000-08:002013-12-23T03:08:50.000-08:00Invest in minds not maths to boost the economy<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029485.800-invest-in-minds-not-maths-to-boost-the-economy.html" rel="nofollow">Invest in minds not maths to boost the economy</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-69208738397371248762013-12-22T09:36:12.724-08:002013-12-22T09:36:12.724-08:00The Voyager probes would need to use codewords who...The Voyager probes would need to use codewords whose sequences were distinct enough to be recognizable even with a few corrupted bits. But using less distinct codewords would provide more possibilities within the 24-bit limit, enabling faster data transmission. These competing needs translated into a geometry problem in which the bits corresponded to spatial coordinates, with each codeword the center point of a sphere in 24-dimensional space. If the spheres overlapped, the associated codewords would no longer be uniquely recognizable. To optimize the amount of data that could be transmitted and then corrected, the question became: <a href="https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20131220-nudging-spheres-closer-little-by-little/" rel="nofollow">How densely could spheres be packed</a> in 24-dimensional space?<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-42224791880805341712013-11-21T08:31:52.161-08:002013-11-21T08:31:52.161-08:00In AWT the classical world results from averaging ...In AWT the classical world results from averaging of quantum mechanics and general relativity theories. So if you're seeking for quantum corrections to general relativity, then the classical world cannot be omitted. The classical forces apply to the dimensional scale which is exactly BETWEEN dimensional scales of general relativity and quantum mechanics, so that every quantum gravity theory must consider (actually predict) them as well. You may call this logics AWT and ignore as such, but this logics is still here. <br /><b><a href="http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/aether/dimensional_scale_graph.gif" rel="nofollow">scheme</a></b><br />For me it's completely clear, that the physicists have their math models developed for particular situations, but they have absolutely no idea, how they should be combined into testable models. They cannot see the forests through their woods of equations, because they were actually never trained to think outside of formal rigor, i.e. in nonformal way. Without their equations they're simply lost and cannot understand anything about their models like toddlers. Actually from my experience with reddit is evident, the nonformal thinking is not only taught at schools, but even prohibited and ridiculed. It's not therefore very difficult to play a role of complete genius and idiot here at the same moment.<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-54710048438924265692013-11-21T08:30:32.293-08:002013-11-21T08:30:32.293-08:00In formal rigor, when two systems of equations are...In formal rigor, when two systems of equations are providing different results for the same set of parameters, they're mutually inconsistent and they share no common solution. At the case of quantum mechanics and general relativity theories such a results is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_catastrophe" rel="nofollow">vacuum density</a>, for example - but we can find even much more trivial example.<br />For example, the quantum mechanics of free massive wave packet predicts, that such packet will expand into infinity with speed of light. This is simply a solution of Schrodinger/Dirac equations and you can do anything with it. But the general relativity predicts instead, that every massive object will collapse into singularity. This is indeed a quite opposite result and you cannot do anything with it again. This is simply, how the general relativity works. <br />So it's evident, that at the formal level both systems of equations are mutually inconsistent and they cannot be never reconciled by means of strictly deterministic formal rigor. This is one of reasons, why I introduced the AWT and its dense aether model. And this is the reason, why string theory leads into landscapes of 10E+500 solutions. <br />If the string theorists would be just a bit more clever and familiar with principles of formal rigor, they could save their forty years of analysis and tax payers money with the same zero result and do something more meaningful. Instead of it, they're getting millions of dollars in various <a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/2013/11/18/the-fundamental-physics-prize-continues-to-be-bad-for-physics/" rel="nofollow">ad-hoced prices</a> from <a href="http://jeffreycarr.blogspot.cz/2011/04/why-yuri-milner-doesnt-want-you-to-know.html" rel="nofollow">similar fraudster</a> for their incoherent nonsense.<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-28344869689678832672013-11-19T12:29:39.601-08:002013-11-19T12:29:39.601-08:00Albert Einstein: "Books on physics are full o...Albert Einstein: "<i>Books on physics are full of complicated mathematical formulas, but thought and ideas are the beginning of every physical theory</i>"Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-19142061937071853302013-11-04T15:18:40.440-08:002013-11-04T15:18:40.440-08:00Einstein was often quoted as saying "If a new...Einstein was often quoted as saying "If a new theory was not based on a physical image simple enough for a child to understand, it was probably worthless." Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-60316504497937224092013-11-01T15:08:19.393-07:002013-11-01T15:08:19.393-07:00Unfortunately many of today scientists seem to be ...Unfortunately many of today scientists seem to be ignoring the lessons taught to us by Einstein. <a href="http://www.theimagineershome.com/blog/?p=11665" rel="nofollow">They chose to look for reality only in terms of abstract mathematics</a> instead of <br /> the physical imagery given to us by the reality of what we can see and touch.<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-73747203360532966222013-10-15T14:46:54.816-07:002013-10-15T14:46:54.816-07:00Liping Ma: "Knowing and Teaching Elementary M...Liping Ma: "<a href="http://www.ams.org/notices/199908/rev-howe.pdf" rel="nofollow">Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics</a>", "<a href="http://www.ams.org/notices/201310/fea-ma.pdf" rel="nofollow">A <br />Critique of the Structure of U.S.Elementary School Mathematics</a>"Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-80281218852987334882013-09-12T14:34:37.795-07:002013-09-12T14:34:37.795-07:00"Shut up and let me think": Quantum foun...<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.5619" rel="nofollow">"Shut up and let me think": Quantum foundations vs the "shut up and calculate" attitude.</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-27733506837073655092013-09-05T04:15:09.494-07:002013-09-05T04:15:09.494-07:00Politics wrecks your ability to do math. New resea...<a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/09/new-study-politics-makes-you-innumerate" rel="nofollow">Politics wrecks your ability to do math</a>. New research suggests that people even solve math problems differently if their political ideology is at stake.Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-22732350872344284592013-09-04T17:13:16.273-07:002013-09-04T17:13:16.273-07:00Is mathematics an effective way to describe the wo...<a href="http://phys.org/news/2013-09-mathematics-effective-world.html#firstCmt" rel="nofollow">Is mathematics an effective way to describe the world</a>? Mathematics appears to be successful because we cherry-pick the problems for which we have found a way to apply mathematics. There have likely been millions of failed mathematical models, but nobody pays attention to them. Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-81686121526730902922013-06-24T14:17:33.990-07:002013-06-24T14:17:33.990-07:00The problem with reductionism, Laughlin says, is t...The problem with reductionism, <a href="http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/reviews/a-different-universe-reinventing-physics-bottom-down/" rel="nofollow">Laughlin say</a>s, is that it’s susceptible to “Dark Corollaries”, which obscure the inconclusive nature of many experiments. One of these corollaries he has dubbed ‘the Deceitful Turkey’, to describe the phantom breakthrough that feels so tantalisingly close but will always be beyond one’s grasp, no matter what computer power or technology is at hand.<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-54936736389369200792013-06-01T11:21:15.975-07:002013-06-01T11:21:15.975-07:00The “Unnatural” Standard Model<a href="http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=5946" rel="nofollow">The “Unnatural” Standard Model</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-84254856920852702742013-06-01T11:17:44.396-07:002013-06-01T11:17:44.396-07:00Max Tegmark: Shut up and calculate! "I advoca...Max Tegmark: <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.4024" rel="nofollow">Shut up and calculate!</a> "<i>I advocate an extreme "shut-up-and-calculate" approach to physics, where our external physical reality is assumed to be purely mathematical. This brief essay motivates this "it's all just equations" assumption and discusses its implications.</i>"<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-91589051212184494462013-06-01T11:04:20.549-07:002013-06-01T11:04:20.549-07:00Is Nature unnatural? Decades of confounding experi...<a href="https://www.simonsfoundation.org/features/science-news/is-nature-unnatural/" rel="nofollow">Is Nature unnatural?</a> Decades of confounding experiments have physicists considering a startling possibility: the universe might not make sense<br />Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-84391008764231742312013-05-21T17:15:10.471-07:002013-05-21T17:15:10.471-07:00The Overuse of Elegant Mathematics<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/04/the-overuse-of-elegant-mathematics" rel="nofollow">The Overuse of Elegant Mathematics</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-16935814750645701702013-05-05T14:14:35.766-07:002013-05-05T14:14:35.766-07:00Richard Feynman: "Physics is to mathematics l...Richard Feynman: "Physics is to mathematics like sex is to masturbation. Sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it."Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-33832583833760606362013-04-07T05:06:04.899-07:002013-04-07T05:06:04.899-07:00http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_inte...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence http://www.otaulc.com/text/1262.htmZephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30708128.post-26875407551475330822012-07-04T16:53:47.288-07:002012-07-04T16:53:47.288-07:00Derivation of the Fine Structure Constant<a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxV2HFmw-aNMcjBqakZjY1NSaGU4WVVGZGJ6R3F4QQ" rel="nofollow">Derivation of the Fine Structure Constant</a>Zephirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.com